Freight spend is one of the larger line items in most trading companies' P&L, and also one of the least understood. Finance can tell you the total — it's on the books. But ask why the number moved last quarter, which vendor drove the increase, whether rates changed or volumes changed, and which lanes are above or below market rate, and most companies can't answer.
This is a visibility problem. The data exists — it's in your quotes, your shipment records, your invoices. But if that data lives in email threads and spreadsheets updated manually, the analysis never gets done because it takes too long.
Here are the five numbers that, tracked consistently, give you meaningful control over your freight spend.
1. Rate per CBM/KG by Lane and Mode
The most basic metric, but surprisingly few companies track it systematically.
Rate per CBM (cubic meter) for ocean freight, and rate per kilogram for air, tracked by lane and mode, is your baseline for knowing whether your freight costs are going up, going down, or staying flat — and whether the change is a market move or specific to your vendor relationships.
The key is that this needs to be tracked at the lane level, not just the total. Global average freight rates are interesting background information. Whether your Dubai-to-Rotterdam FCL rate has increased 15% over six months while market rates have only moved 5% is something you can actually act on.
When you have rate history by lane, you can:
- Benchmark new quotes against your own historical data
- Identify when a vendor is creeping rates up gradually, below the threshold where you'd notice a single invoice
- Spot lanes where you're likely paying above market and prioritize re-tendering
Track the rate every time you accept a quote. Twelve months of that data per lane is more useful than any external benchmarking service.
2. Quote Response Rate by Vendor
If you send an RFQ to five vendors and only three quote consistently, you effectively have three vendors, not five. The other two are taking up time in your vendor management process without adding competitive pressure.
Quote response rate — the percentage of RFQs a vendor responds to within your deadline — is one of the best leading indicators of vendor reliability. A vendor who quotes 90% of the time is more predictable than one who quotes 60% of the time, even if the 60% vendor occasionally wins on price.
Most shippers don't track this because tracking it requires a system. Every RFQ has to be logged, every response (or non-response) has to be recorded, and the calculation has to happen automatically. When this metric is visible, vendor conversations change. "You've responded to 4 out of the last 10 RFQs we sent on this lane" is a concrete piece of information that either leads to improvement or leads you to reduce how many RFQs you send that vendor.
3. Average Quote-to-Acceptance Cycle Time
How long does it take from when you send an RFQ to when you've selected a vendor and have a confirmed shipment ready to book? If this number is longer than 48 hours on standard shipments, time is leaking out of your process somewhere.
The reasons this metric matters beyond the obvious operational efficiency are:
- Long cycle times create pressure to accept the first good-enough quote rather than waiting for all responses, which leads to suboptimal vendor selection
- Slow procurement cycles limit how much forward planning you can do, because you can't get rates confirmed far enough in advance
- Process time eats into the lead time buffer that lets you choose sea freight over air on time-sensitive shipments
Breaking down where the time goes is useful: Are you spending two days chasing vendors to respond? Is the comparison analysis taking long because it's done manually? Is the approval process creating a bottleneck? The metric tells you there's a problem; the breakdown tells you where to fix it.
4. Spend by Vendor
This sounds obvious, but the goal is not just to know the total — it's to understand concentration risk and negotiating leverage.
If 70% of your freight spend goes through a single vendor, you have a concentration problem. That vendor has very little incentive to stay competitive, and any disruption to that relationship — personnel change, capacity constraint during peak season, vendor financial difficulty — has outsized impact on your operations.
Tracking spend by vendor over time also shows whether your vendor mix is evolving the way you intend. If a new vendor you brought in six months ago was supposed to provide competition on a key lane but is still only getting 5% of the volume, either they're not competitive or they're not getting a fair share of the RFQs.
A healthy vendor mix on any significant lane usually looks like 50-60% primary vendor, 30-40% secondary, and 10-15% tertiary or spot market. If the numbers are significantly different from that, it's worth understanding why.
5. Estimated vs. Actual Charges
This is the one that catches most shippers by surprise: the gap between what the vendor quoted and what they actually invoiced.
A certain amount of variance is normal — surcharges change, actual weights come in slightly different from estimates. But if a particular vendor consistently invoices 8-12% above their quoted rate, that quote is actually misleading when you're using it in a comparison. You're effectively comparing their headline rate against another vendor's all-in rate.
Tracking the ratio of actual invoice to quoted rate per vendor gives you an adjusted effective rate that's more useful for comparison purposes. A vendor who quotes $950 per CBM and invoices $1,080 consistently is more expensive than a vendor who quotes $1,000 and invoices $1,010, despite appearing cheaper at quote time.
This analysis also identifies which vendors' quotes you can trust and which require a buffer when you're running close to budget.
How to Start Tracking These
If you're starting from zero, the most practical approach is:
-
Set up a simple spreadsheet with one row per shipment and columns for: lane, mode, vendor, quoted rate, accepted date, invoice amount, RFQ sent date, quote deadline.
-
Fill it in consistently for every shipment. The data is only useful if it's complete — spot-checking doesn't tell you the response rate accurately.
-
Calculate the five metrics from this data on a monthly basis. That's enough frequency to notice trends without creating reporting overhead.
-
After six months, you'll have enough history to start making data-driven vendor decisions.
The goal isn't to drown in data. It's to have the four or five numbers that tell you whether your freight procurement is getting better or worse, and why.
Logwo's freight analytics module tracks all of these metrics automatically — spend by vendor, quote response rates, rate trends by lane, and quote-to-acceptance cycle time. No manual logging required. See the analytics dashboard →